Alphabetical List of Kerala Towns and their population

Posted on by keralaclick

1. Adoor (M) [ KER, Population: 28952, Class – III ]

2. Akathiyoor (CT) [ KER, Population: 5274, Class – V ]

3. Alappuzha UA [ KER, Population: 282675, Class – I ]

4. Ancharakandy (CT) [ KER, Population: 21878, Class – III ]

5. Arookutty (CT) [ KER, Population: 17393, Class – IV ]

6. Aroor (CT) [ KER, Population: 35283, Class – III ]

7. Attingal (M) [ KER, Population: 35693, Class – III ]

8. Avinissery (CT) [ KER, Population: 11462, Class – IV ]

9. Bangramanjeshwar (CT) [ KER, Population: 5636, Class – V ]

10. Chala (CT) [ KER, Population: 15530, Class – IV ]

11. Chalakudy (M) [ KER, Population: 48380, Class – III ]

12. Changanassery (M) [ KER, Population: 51967, Class – II ]

13. Chelora (CT) [ KER, Population: 19566, Class – IV ]

14. Chendamangalam (CT) [ KER, Population: 28147, Class – III ]

15. Chengannur (M) [ KER, Population: 25397, Class – III ]

16. Cherthala UA [ KER, Population: 141558, Class – I ]

17. Cheruthazham (CT) [ KER, Population: 26239, Class – III ]

18. Chevvoor (CT) [ KER, Population: 17373, Class – IV ]

19. Chittur-Thathamangalam UA [ KER, Population: 67935, Class – II ]

20. Chockli (CT) [ KER, Population: 31772, Class – III ]

21. Erattupetta (CT) [ KER, Population: 29682, Class – III ]

22. Guruvayoor UA [ KER, Population: 138681, Class – I ]

23. Hosabettu (CT) [ KER, Population: 5915, Class – V ]

24. Idukki Township (TS) [ KER, Population: 11347, Class – IV ]

25. Irinjalakuda (M) [ KER, Population: 28873, Class – III ]

26. Iriveri (CT) [ KER, Population: 15669, Class – IV ]

27. Kadirur (CT) [ KER, Population: 28989, Class – III ]

28. Kalliasseri (CT) [ KER, Population: 28068, Class – III ]

29. Kalpetta (M) [ KER, Population: 29612, Class – III ]

30. Kanhangad UA [ KER, Population: 129367, Class – I ]

31. Kanhirode (CT) [ KER, Population: 13955, Class – IV ]

32. Kanjikkuzhi (CT) [ KER, Population: 22127, Class – III ]

33. Kannadiparamba (CT) [ KER, Population: 12658, Class – IV ]

34. Kannapuram (CT) [ KER, Population: 18527, Class – IV ]

35. Kannur UA [ KER, Population: 498207, Class – I ]

36. Kasaragod UA [ KER, Population: 75968, Class – II ]

37. Kayamkulam (M) [ KER, Population: 68585, Class – II ]

38. Kochi UA [ KER, Population: 1355972, Class – I ]

39. Kodungallur UA [ KER, Population: 94883, Class – II ]

40. Kolazhy (CT) [ KER, Population: 8447, Class – V ]

41. Kollam UA [ KER, Population: 380091, Class – I ]

42. Koothuparamba (M) [ KER, Population: 29532, Class – III ]

43. Koratty (CT) [ KER, Population: 17455, Class – IV ]

44. Kothamangalam (M) [ KER, Population: 37173, Class – III ]

45. Kottayam UA [ KER, Population: 172878, Class – I ]

46. Kottayam-Malabar (CT) [ KER, Population: 17501, Class – IV ]

47. Kozhikode UA [ KER, Population: 880247, Class – I ]

48. Kunnamkulam (M) [ KER, Population: 51592, Class – II ]

49. Malappuram UA [ KER, Population: 170409, Class – I ]

50. Manjeshwar (CT) [ KER, Population: 8675, Class – V ]

51. Marathakkara (CT) [ KER, Population: 17938, Class – IV ]

52. Mattannur (M) [ KER, Population: 44313, Class – III ]

53. Mavelikkara (M) [ KER, Population: 28439, Class – III ]

54. Mavilayi (CT) [ KER, Population: 11954, Class – IV ]

55. Mavoor (CT) [ KER, Population: 27845, Class – III ]

56. Munderi (CT) [ KER, Population: 19478, Class – IV ]

57. Muvattupuzha (M) [ KER, Population: 29246, Class – III ]

58. Narath (CT) [ KER, Population: 12554, Class – IV ]

59. Nedumangad (M) [ KER, Population: 56138, Class – II ]

60. Nenmenikkara (CT) [ KER, Population: 17407, Class – IV ]

61. Neyyattinkara (M) [ KER, Population: 69467, Class – II ]

62. Ottappalam (M) [ KER, Population: 49242, Class – III ]

63. Paduvilayi (CT) [ KER, Population: 19190, Class – IV ]

64. Palai (M) [ KER, Population: 22640, Class – III ]

65. Palakkad UA [ KER, Population: 197369, Class – I ]

66. Palissery (CT) [ KER, Population: 7939, Class – V ]

67. Panniyannur (CT) [ KER, Population: 20863, Class – III ]

68. Panoor (CT) [ KER, Population: 16288, Class – IV ]

69. Pappinisseri (CT) [ KER, Population: 33273, Class – III ]

70. Paravoor (M) [ KER, Population: 38652, Class – III ]

71. Pathanamthitta (M) [ KER, Population: 38009, Class – III ]

72. Pathiriyad (CT) [ KER, Population: 16611, Class – IV ]

73. Pattiom (CT) [ KER, Population: 19955, Class – IV ]

74. Payyannur (M) [ KER, Population: 68734, Class – II ]

75. Peralasseri (CT) [ KER, Population: 15816, Class – IV ]

76. Peringathur (CT) [ KER, Population: 37699, Class – III ]

77. Perinthalmanna (M) [ KER, Population: 44612, Class – III ]

78. Perumbavoor (M) [ KER, Population: 26547, Class – III ]

79. Pinarayi (CT) [ KER, Population: 15831, Class – IV ]

80. Ponnani (M) [ KER, Population: 87495, Class – II ]

81. Pottore (CT) [ KER, Population: 8161, Class – V ]

82. Punalur (M) [ KER, Population: 47235, Class – III ]

83. Puranattukara (CT) [ KER, Population: 9600, Class – V ]

84. Puthukkad (CT) [ KER, Population: 12501, Class – IV ]

85. Quilandy (M) [ KER, Population: 68982, Class – II ]

86. Shoranur (M) [ KER, Population: 42029, Class – III ]

87. Taliparamba (M) [ KER, Population: 67507, Class – II ]

88. Thiruvalla (M) [ KER, Population: 56837, Class – II ]

89. Thiruvananthapuram UA [ KER, Population: 889635, Class – I ]

90. Thodupuzha (M) [ KER, Population: 46246, Class – III ]

91. Thrissur UA [ KER, Population: 330122, Class – I ]

92. Tirur (M) [ KER, Population: 53654, Class – II ]

93. Udma (CT) [ KER, Population: 8139, Class – V ]

94. Vadakara UA [ KER, Population: 124083, Class – I ]

95. Vaikom (M) [ KER, Population: 22641, Class – III ]

96. Vallachira (CT) [ KER, Population: 13345, Class – IV ]

97. Varam (CT) [ KER, Population: 14741, Class – IV ]

98. Varkala (M) [ KER, Population: 40728, Class – III ]

Notes:

Abbreviations used:

C.B.- Cantonment Board/Cantonment;

C.M.C.- City Municipal Council;

E.O – Estate Office;

G.P.- Gram Panchayat;

I.N.A.- Industrial Notified Area;

I.T.S.- Industrial Township;

M – Municipality;

M.B.- Municipal Board;

M.C.- Municipal Committee;

M.Cl.- Municipal Council;

M.Corp.- Municipal Corporation/Corporation;

N.A.- Notified Area;

N.A.C.- Notified Area Committee/Notified Area Council;

N.P. – Nagar Panchayat;

N.T.-Notified Town;

N.T.A.- Notified Town Area;

S.T.C.- Small Town Committee;

T.C.- Town Committee/Town Area Committee;

T.M.C. – Town Municipal Council;

T.P. – Town Panchayat;

T.S.- Township;

C.T.- Census

Town; O.G.- Out Growth

U. A. or Urban Agglomeration is a continuous urban spread constituting a town and its adjoining urban outgrowths (OGs) or two or more physically contiguous towns together and any adjoining urban outgrowths of such towns. Examples of OGs are railway colony, university campus, port areas, etc. , that may come up near a city or statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the revenue limits of a village or villages contiguous to the town or city.

In 2001 Census, for the purpose of delineation of Urban Agglomerations the pre-requisite criteria were: (a) The core town or at least one of the constituent towns of an UA should necessarily be a statutory town; and (b) the total population of all the constituents (i.e., towns and outgrowths) of an Urban Agglomeration should not be less than 20,000 (as per 1991 Census). Population size-class: Class I: 100,000 and above; Class II: 50,000 to 99,999; Class III: 20,000 to 49,999; Class IV: 10,000 to 19,999; Class V: 5,000 to 9,999 and Class VI: Less than 5,000 persons.

This is the html version of the file http://censusindia.gov.in/towns/ker_towns.pdf.

Source: censusindia.gov.in

Related Blogs

33 thoughts on “Alphabetical List of Kerala Towns and their population”

  1. Pingback: Bonds Blogg

  8. It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to recommend you some attention-grabbing things or advice. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles regarding this article. I wish to learn even more issues about it!

  9. Hmm it seems like your website ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips and hints for beginner blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  10. Pingback: Bang Bang Bang

  11. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  13. Pingback: iPhone Video Hero

  14. What a outstanding viewpoint, nonetheless is just not produce every sence by any means discussing this mather. Just about any technique thanks and also i had try and discuss your post directly into delicius but it surely appears to be an problem within your blogging is it possible you must recheck this. thank you just as before.

  15. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  16. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  17. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  18. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  19. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  20. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  21. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  22. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  23. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  24. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  25. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  26. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  27. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  28. Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  29. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  30. Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  31. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  32. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  33. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

Leave a Reply